Old racism, meet the new racism.

OK, seriously, go find some videos of puppies or something on youtube, whatever calms you the hell down, you’re going to need it after this. If you ever wanted to know why I’m a leftist commie liberal pinko, this would be why, right here. Yes, I know it’s long, but don’t forget to check out the comments as well, and I make some after the link.

http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/2011/08/our-post-911-world-ten-year.html

First of all, what the fuck is up with turning everything “to glass”? Second, OK, let’s assume for the moment that we were justified in using nuclear weapons. Why the hell are we using them, just because some countries didn’t confess to their supposed roles in the attack? That’s like saying, “buddy, I know you heard a rumor that somebody might try to break my legs, admit it or I’ll kill your entire family”. That’s fucking insane.

On to the comments, what the hell is up with the Aussie dipshit who had to go check and see if this was really true? I think my favorite comment of all though was the one about how the essay describes a vision of peace. What the fuck ever.

Yes, I know there’s so so so much more to say about this, but I’m just completely numbed, every time I read it. There are apparently people out there who think this is exactly what we should have done, and I just have difficulty comprehending that. I think I’ll go pray to every god I can think of that somebody like that never ever gets any kind of power.

Yes, don’t worry, I’m done with the super depressing racist bullshit. It’s just that the other piece reminded me of this one, and I felt like posting it and commenting on it. I often say that people need to know the crazies in this country, and this is precisely why. I’m sorry, this should just be wrong, period, full stop, end of fucking story. And I’m generally a relativist. But you tell people about this, or crazy Christians like Fred Phelps, and it’s “I know, I know, yeah, they’re there”. But none of those people really know what any of these people actually say. I think they need to. So I share things like this every once in a while.

Advertisements

Happy MLK day!

Just in case you were wondering if we had anymore work to do realizing the dream, welcome to the 19th century. Oh wait, no, the early 20th century I guess. Nope, come to think of it, the whole civil rights struggle was really getting ramped up in the 60s. So hell, who knows? Welcome to now then, where we still have batshit crazy people using 19th century science to bolster their racism.

Seriously? Africans have different skull sizes from white people? Really? It always amazes me how these “think for yourself” types, the type of people who are all against the man keeping them down, with his political correctness, evolution, religion, you name it, can’t be bothered to actually research or understand whatever subject they’re blathering about. Perhaps coincidentally, or maybe not, lots of them seem to really dig the hell out of discredited 19th century theories, probably because, since they haven’t done the aforementioned research, they don’t realize they’ve been discredited. So for the rest of us, enjoy this crazy window back into our batshit insane past.

http://libertarianrealist.blogspot.com/2011/11/on-ayn-rand-on-racism.html

Dan Savage put us all in high school again.

OK, since this is coming up over and over and over again, I feel the need to put in my two cents. No, I don’t think this is anything earth shatteringly original, but here it is anyway.

Dan Savage is kind of a petty dickhead. Look, he’s done a lot of cool stuff. He’s gotten some decent advice on sex out there. He talks about things a lot of other people shy away from, and he gets it out to a national audience. That’s great. He’s also involved with, or might have started, the whole “It Gets Better” thing, and seriously, if you don’t know what that is, go look it up right now. It’s pretty damn awesome. I’m not suggesting that this takes away from any of those accomplishments.

But there’s something else he’s responsible for, namely the whole Santorum thing. If you don’t know what that is, basically Santorum made some comments implying gay marriage would lead directly to things like incest and bestiality. Dan Savage decided to be truly relevant, and proposed that people submit redefinitions of Santorum. They picked a winner, which I’m not reproducing here, you have a google, go be grossed out on your own time, if you don’t know what it is already.

If you haven’t guessed, that claim of relevance was complete sarcasm. Hence why I said, Dan Savage is kind of a petty dickhead. In the first place, wow, you got your stupid idea all over TV, good for you. In the second place, it’s just childish. I don’t mean that in the sense of it lacks decorum or whatever, I’m calling him a petty dickhead, clearly I don’t really care about that sort of thing.

I mean it’s literally childish. It sounds like the kind of awesome burn you’d come up with when you were 12. It sounds like something some teenage girls might come up with, “hey, let’s all say that Tina Bowman means you pooped your pants OK? Then we’ll all be like, ‘hey did you hear about Stacie? Yeah, I heard she really had to go but couldn’t make it to the bathroom and she totally did a Tina Bowman!'” Then they could giggle behind their locker doors or something.

Now look, I’m not at all suggesting everything needs to be all serious. Hell, if it were me, I would’ve just gone with it and defined Santorum as having sex with the dead male dog you considered a member of the family. I mean, if we’re responding to his gay = incest and bestiality thing, then let’s respond, fer Chrissakes. Go all out, work fire in there somehow too. But really, what the hell does redefining his name accomplish? It’s not really funny. It’s not really clever. But apparently lots of articles and a fair bit of TV feels the need to mention it every half second.

So now I have to put up with hearing about something that sounds like it was proposed by a crack-addled teenager just before she went off to write some emo poetry about how nobody understands her, and draw harts with her name and Justin Bieber’s name in them on her trapper keeper, or whatever the hell kids use these days. Hell there’s probably some sort of Bieber emo poetry iPad app now that does all the work for you.

But back to Dan Savage. I’m not saying I know what a really good response would have been, as such. I’m just saying, I’m pretty sure the one he actually came up with wasn’t it. But apparently half the media and just about all of the internet loves the hell out of it. So since we’re all apparently back in high school again, I’ll just do what I did back then. Y’all do whatever you feel you need to, and I’ll be over here doing something that’s actually interesting.

Let me know when you’ve gotten all the gleeful giggling and hand-rubbing out of your systems, and then maybe we can have some sort of actual intelligent conversation or go get drunk or something, I dunno. But yes, I get it, you redefined somebody’s name, and you think it’s terribly terribly clever. Please stop telling me about it, I don’t care. It wasn’t funny or clever to begin with, and it’s not magically funny or clever just because some time has passed and Santorum’s suddenly back in the news again. It’s still just something your dimwitted 12 year-old brain thought was hilarious. Dan Savage should apologize for bringing something so sad and pathetic into the world whenever anybody brings it up.